Reading a blog post like this one is something we all do multiple times a day. As early as 20 years ago, such a concept was still entirely unknown to the rest of the world. Walter Isaacson’s “The Innovators…” book is a history telling of the players involved from the early days of Ada Lovelace all the way through to Google’s search success.
Here are some of my favorite highlights from the book.
You may have heard of Von Neumann’s “Neumann Architecture,” for processors. More than just a namesake architecture, he was the first person to embrace the open source idea. How? He spread other’s ideas around without taking credit, but giving credit where due. He thought it was more important to share ideas than worry about who came up with them.
One of the first computer-related trivia I ever learned was the origin of the first “computer bug.” The, now infamous, bug that Grace Hopper discovered on the Mark II and how the first debugging session happened is covered in great detail. This story also highlights one of my favorite aspects of Isaacson’s treatment: the historic role of women.
Critical Role of Women
In high school, I learned that ENIAC was the first functioning digital computer. That fact may have some dispute. However, every one of the early machines did have a common element: their programmers are Women.
The Invention of the Internet
Beyond understanding the important role women played in computer history, there is one other key reason to read this book. Walter Isaacson dispels the myths of how the Internet was created. Like so many stories we hear, the individual pieces can be assembled in multiple ways. While each piece is true, they lack the context to understand “what really happened.”
In “The Innovators” you learn that the Internet was both created to help war but also to help peace.
Linux and Modern Computing[shareable cite=”Linus Torvalds”]”Folks do their best work when they are driven by passion.”[/shareable]
Once you hit the sections in the book on Bill Gates, Steve Jobs, and Woz it starts to move very quickly. I don’t know if that is because the information is less dense or because so much of it is familiar.
It’ll be interesting to see how the context of this book changes over the next 20 years.
If you’re interested, here are my kindle notes.