<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" standalone="yes"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>aeroscope on Bald Engineer</title><link>https://www.baldengineer.com/tag/aeroscope</link><description>Recent content in aeroscope on Bald Engineer</description><generator>Hugo</generator><language>en-US</language><lastBuildDate>Wed, 19 Jul 2017 20:54:51 +0000</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://www.baldengineer.com/tag/aeroscope/index.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/><item><title>Aeroscope Review</title><link>https://www.baldengineer.com/aeroscope-review.html</link><pubDate>Wed, 19 Jul 2017 13:11:36 +0000</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.baldengineer.com/?p=6609</guid><description>Previously, I reviewed the smartphone DMM, Mooshimeter. It is a great meter. One feature I didn’t spend much time on in my review was the ability to graph. Some see it as an “oscilloscope alternative.” The past couple of weeks, I’ve been using Aeroscope. It is a Bluetooth-based oscilloscope about the size of an older active probe. The Aeroscope runs $199 direct from Aeroscope Labs. The question I address in this Aeroscope review: is it better to buy this, a USB-based, or standalone scope for about the same money. How does it measure up?<p><img src="https://www.baldengineer.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/07/AeroWEB-9488.jpg" alt="Aeroscope Review"/></p></description></item></channel></rss>